Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    April 28, 2024

    April 28, 2024

    April 28, 2024
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Hote NewsHote News
    • Health Science
    • Lifestyle
    • Politics
    • Reel
    • Sports
    • Travel
    • Worklife
    Hote NewsHote News
    Politics

    “Assessing Israel’s Actions: Just-War Approach”

    November 13, 2023
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Israel’s response to the Hamas attack on Oct. 7 has sparked widespread protest among critics and soul-searching among supporters. The death of thousands of Palestinian civilians in the Gaza Strip calls for a careful examination of the moral basis for Israel’s actions.

    The “just war” theory, a prominent moral framework, offers a set of criteria to consider the use of force. While Israel has just cause and constitutes a legitimate authority, it falls short in meeting the other criteria. However, the fact that Hamas has violated these principles does not absolve Israel from its obligation to uphold higher moral standards.

    If Israel is perceived to have committed war crimes, it could face consequences such as damage to its diplomatic standing and trade, as well as potential trials at the International Criminal Court or in nations with universal jurisdiction.

    To determine the justness of Israel’s actions, each criterion and the evidence must be examined. Israel has just cause for self-defense and has a legitimate aim of neutralizing Hamas. However, its intent to establish long-term peace is questionable, as its government has shown little commitment to genuine peace efforts and has allowed the growth of settlements.

    The net benefit of Israel’s actions is outweighed by the potential intergenerational rage and recruitment for extremist groups resulting from the loss of Palestinian lives. There is also a risk of a wider war and damage to Israel’s foreign relations.

    Israel’s use of force should be the last resort, but it has dismissed direct negotiations and potential peace processes. The proportionality of means is also questionable, as civilian casualties and damage in Gaza far exceed any military advantage gained by Israel. Noncombatant distinction is another criterion, and while Israel claims to distinguish between fighters and civilians, urban warfare makes it difficult to avoid civilian casualties.

    Israel’s conduct will be judged by the international community, and it will determine its place in history. It is hoped that this prospect will lead the Israeli government towards peaceful solutions rather than continued war.

    Post Views: 3
    Related Posts

    April 28, 2024

    April 28, 2024

    April 28, 2024

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Controversial Israeli Video Sparks Gaza Hospital Information Battle

    November 14, 2023

    April 28, 2024

    Met Police commander sacked for failing drug test

    November 1, 2023

    European Council President calls for revival of multilateralism

    November 1, 2023
    About Us
    About Us

    We’re impartial and independent, and every day we create distinctive, world-class programmes and content which inform, educate and entertain millions of people in the UK and around the world.

    Email Us: info@hotenews.com

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube LinkedIn WhatsApp TikTok Discord Telegram Threads RSS
    Our Picks

    April 28, 2024

    April 28, 2024

    April 28, 2024
    Most Popular

    Controversial Israeli Video Sparks Gaza Hospital Information Battle

    November 14, 2023

    April 28, 2024

    Met Police commander sacked for failing drug test

    November 1, 2023
    © 2025 Hotenews
    • Privacy Policy
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.